Add a Comment (Go Up to OJB's Blog Page)
I Get It Now!
Entry 1154, on 2010-02-04 at 19:38:12 (Rating 1, Computers)
I suppose many people would classify me as an Apple "fanboy" (or, to use a more complimentary term, an Apple enthusiast and computing professional). Even so, I was initially a bit skeptical about the new iPad. First, I didn't like the name; second, I thought it needed a camera (and maybe a few other useful hardware components, like an SD card slot and USB port); and finally, I wanted multitasking!
I'm currently writing a review of some of the highlights of Richard Dawkins' book, "The Greatest Show on Earth" so I'm carrying the book around with me (in my laptop bag) so I can work on it when I have a few spare minutes. But that book is heavy (its 470 pages) and uses a lot of space in my bag so its quite inconvenient to use.
It would be so much easier if I had a copy of the book on a compact, easy to read device which I could set bookmarks on, copy quotes from, and store lots of other books on as well. Wait a minute... that sounds like an iPad! And it wouldn't matter if it had a camera or not (I have a very nice SLR and a camera in my iPhone and one in my laptop). And it wouldn't matter if it didn't multi-task either!
Of course, I could use a Kindle as my eBook reader but that really is a single purpose device (and about the same price as some iPads anyway) so that would be just too limited.
There is also evidence that Apple might be going to put a camera in the iPad - possibly even in the current model before its released - so it would be there if I did need it. Plus many people are saying that future versions of the iPhone OS (which the iPad uses) will include multi-tasking (its an operating system limitation more than a hardware one).
So I think I get it. I didn't think I needed an iPad but obviously I do. I think when I do get one I'll never buy another physical book. I have several book cases full of them and storing them electronically is just so much more efficient.
I do have eBooks on my laptop and iPhone already but neither of those are as nice to read from as a book. I do use PDFs on my laptop for technical documentation but that's not the sort of thing I read for long periods of time - even a computer geek like me doesn't like reading a 1000 page PHP manual like a novel!
I have said in the past that I don't like to get too enthusiastic about a new product until I have a chance to use it but I think when I do get to test an iPad I will be quickly wanting to go out and buy one!
Comment 1 (2599) by GadgetDon on 2010-02-05 at 02:01:21:
A camera for pictures, I can see. But a video camera for videoconferencing - you'd have to hold the iPad completely still, or somehow prop it up just so. My theory is that it did have a video camera, but in testing, people on the other side almost got motion sickness unless it was docked (which most people won't).
Comment 2 (2600) by OJB on 2010-02-05 at 08:15:47:
I don't know if I accept that explanation. People use cell phones for video calls. The iPad CPU should be fast enough to do image stabilisation too.
You can leave comments about this entry using this form.
To add a comment: enter a name and email (both optional), type the number shown above, enter a comment, then click Add.
Note that you can leave the name blank if you want to remain anonymous.
Enter your email address to receive notifications of replies and updates to this entry.
The comment should appear immediately because the authorisation system is currently inactive.